Michael Barbaro proposes that you sit down over a meal with a loved one who voted in a way you find incomprehensible and indefensible and have each of you discuss 19 questions, while not letting "imperfect word choices tank the conversation," forgetting "the policy debate for now," and assuming "the other person has generally good intentions." (more…)
Popular Posts
-
Looking for something to illustrate a post about crunch-time in game development, I ran into this video depicting many forms of footwear (...
-
https://vimeo.com/71952791 What happens if you allow a group of onlookers to do anything they want to you for six hours? Marina Abramovich ...
-
The story varies depending on the source—momma being killed by a trap, run over by a car, lawnmowered, etc—but in all cases the result is t...
-
After relentlessly roasting her for her rice cooking technique, Uncle Roger gives Hersha Patel a chance to redeem herself when he visits...
-
I enjoyed reading David Joiner's retrospective about game development in the early days of the Commodore Amiga : like many creators of ...
-
Reddit user u/Dinaeh has been posting updates of their project to recreate the world from Zelda Breath of the Wild in Minecraft . They ar...
-
A recent paper from the scientific journal Frontiers in Microbiology has proposed a potential new method for growing oxygen-producing a...
-
In March 2021, the New York Times posted an in-depth look at the life of Ron DeLord , a former Texas police officer who became a labor org...
-
Habitot Children's Museum in Berkeley, California is making an unusually generous offer to the families of homeless kids. They are prov...
-
Geographic information systems used to be 2-D maps, but new AR technologies are letting users see where pipes and other underground infras...
